Music Notes
front page

 
New AMPPR Board Members

 
Announcements

 
What WKSU Listeners Think About Public Radio’s March into the On-Line Universe
By Eric Nuzum

 
. . . the music 
ain’t bad
by Karl Haas

 
Understanding Research
by Bob Goldfarb

 
MPC 38 Cassette
 Tape Order Form 

 
AMPPR
HOME PAGE 
 

 

Music Notes 

Association of Music Personnel in Public Radio 
Spring 2000 


A Look into the Future: A Summary of Some MPC 38 Presentations 
by Howard Cornelsen and the editor of Music Notes



Gunther SchullerGunther Schuller stressed the need to keep “intelligent, broadly engaging programming” on the airwaves in his keynote address to the conference. He reminded programmers that “we [in public radio] are an oasis surrounded by a vast desert of commercial, profit-motivated networks and conglomerates who would just as soon see most of us give up and quietly go away.” He stressed the concept that we, as a people, are defined by our art, culture, and creativity, but that the driving forces in today’s market are at odds with this concept. The media have been turned into a cultural wasteland by becoming a profit-driven industry.

Schuller conceded that there are still some commercial stations, mostly in major metropolitan areas, that are programming creatively; however, the media in general, including public radio, are driven by bottom-line consultants and advisors, resulting in easy, safe, non-risk-taking programming.

Although the future is unpredictable, Schuller feels optimistic that the people we hear from are outweighed by the people we don’t; and it is those quiet people who support public broadcasting financially and emotionally. These are people who like to be challenged by adventurous programming that could never be considered background. “Keep the faith,” he said. “Our country needs leadership, not followers . . . it really needs you.”
 

Stephen SalyerStephen Salyer feels that public radio is facing far more serious competition than any of us yet realize. For example, satellite-delivered Sirius Radio will have 50 music channels hosted and programmed by radio people. This speaks to two problems, that of increased competition in programming and that of well-funded new groups having the money to hire away public radio producers and programmers. As more media channels combine, our income will be eroded. Public radio needs a reorientation of mission and strategy to avoid being hurt by these new threats.

Examples of good uses of a station’s web site cited by Salyer: The station should offer music that it doesn’t want on its air but knows its listeners might like to hear; a book reviewed on “Marketplace” should be available on the station’s web site, rather than sending the listener off to amazon.com.

A station’s biggest asset is not its content, since that will be becoming ubiquitous, but its audience. The station must associate its brand with that audience at every level.
 

Skip PizziSkip Pizzi also sees new competition coming for public radio. There are many types of internet content providers; broadband access is rapidly becoming available for the home; mobile satellite radio is around the corner, as are wireless internet terrestrial and LEOSat (Low Earth Orbital satellite) connections. Not all of the new ventures will be successful, but they all offer differing threats. Certainly, having 150 channels available is one thing; how many a user may actually program a button to receive is another. But once a person starts paying a subscription for a radio channel, that person may feel much less inclined to send money to a station asking for his support.

Pizzi feels we should consider four categories of future audiences: local on air, local on line, national on air, and global on line. There will be both convergent home media users and convergent mobile users. On air the programming should lean more toward local content that can’t be duplicated by national services. 

On line connections must be solidified by promotional functions. Here we have not only one-way webcasting, but also two-way contacts, giving us immediate feedback; and we should not overlook the possibility of multiple data streams in webcasting.

On-demand audio, an off-air archive, and “tell-me-more” items should be considered. Additional text, graphics, and links should be added: in general, more information on the station’s own web site under its own brand should be available to keep people from needing to go elsewhere. Information on the composer, the piece, the performer, the disc, the period would all be worthwhile additions for music.

Pizzi went on to recommend on-line fundraising. On line is a good place to solicit underwriters and to accept user contributions. It’s also a good place for premium fulfillment, supplying the order directly to the provider. It’s an excellent place to promote station events and for scheduling volunteers. Radio is only the form, not the function of our business. Pizzi recommends leveraging the on-air and on-line synergies, cross-promoting, cross-selling—even developing the web site as a portal. 
 

More---->